What's Happening?

Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin

NEED HELP? QUESTIONS@FIA.ORG.ZA

become A FIA member TODAY
member login

2019 – Customer Satisfaction Index for Medical Schemes Shows Underwhelming Performances

ARTICLE BY

  • Consulta

SHARE THIS POST

The views expressed in this article are not those of the FIA

 

Medical schemes are facing tremendous pressure in a low growth market where customer expectations and utilisation are very high and increasing, while loyalty is on the decline as a result of lower price tolerance.  As the economy bites and more consumers opt to downgrade their cover to lower benefit options in a bid to cut costs, they are not realigning their ‘consumption-based’ expectations and are struggling to decipher the complexity of benefit options and scheme rules.

These are just some of the findings in the latest South African Customer Satisfaction Index (SA-csi) for Medical Schemes (2019) conducted by Consulta which provides highly scientific insights into the overall level of satisfaction of customers of South Africa’s medical scheme providers – Bonitas, Discovery, GEMS, Medihelp and Momentum.  GEMS is the only closed medical scheme included in the survey.  Consulta polled 1707 medical scheme members across five of the leading schemes by membership numbers.

Customers of all medical schemes polled in the 2019 Index indicated that they do not believe that the premiums paid match the quality of cover and experience on offer. Across the board, the industry is struggling to meet the needs of customers in terms of benefit design that meets the needs of customers in a simple and transparent manner.  No outright leader was identified in this year’s index, with Bonitas and Discovery obtaining a joint leadership position, Medihelp coming in on par with the industry average (72.9) while Momentum is just below par and GEMS lagging in last place. 

The SA-csi for Medical Schemes is the most comprehensive survey of customer satisfaction in South Africa, and is a causal model that links customer expectations, perceived quality, and perceived value to customer satisfaction (the SA-csi score), which in turn is linked to customer complaints (and recovery), and customer loyalty intentions. 

Key take-outs from the SA-csi for Medical Schemes 2019

Customer Satisfaction – Overall Index

  • Bonitas (75.1) and Discovery (74.8) lead the industry, Medihelp (73.5) come in on par with the industry average score of (72.9), while Momentum scores just below and GEMS with the lowest score at 68.3.  Overall customer satisfaction for the industry has increased to 72.9 compared with 71.6 in 2018.
  • Bonitas and Discovery were the only two schemes to show an improvement on 2018 scores, with Bonitas showing a big improvement of 4.9 index points in 2019, followed by Discovery with 1.7 index points. 
  • Gems (-0.5), Medihelp (-1.6) and Momentum (-1.3) showed a decline on overall customer satisfaction compared with 2018 scores. 
  • While Discovery, GEMS, Medihelp and Momentum have stayed relatively stagnant on overall customer satisfaction scores for the last two years, Bonitas has made a significant improvement in 2019, suggesting that recent strategic reviews of its benefit options and member focus are starting to pay dividends.

Customer Expectations and Perceived Quality

  • Across all brands, customer expectations are not being met consistently.  South African customers have very high expectations of their medical scheme providers (industry average of 80.6) given the fact that it’s an expensive buy and communication around benefits is often not done clearly.  
  • Bonitas and Medihelp are the only two brands that showed a positive gap – albeit marginal – where perceived quality meets customer expectations.

Perceived Value

  • Perceived value is a measure of the quality, relative to the price paid.  The perception of value for money is a very strong predictor of future usage and company growth.
  • In terms of the value index, Medihelp (71.6) takes the lead, Bonitas (70.9), Discovery (70.6) and Momentum (71.4) are all on par with the industry (69.6).  GEMS is below par at 66.1.  Bonitas and Discovery are the only two schemes that saw a marginal increase in Perceived Value score compared with 2018.
  • However, when Perceived Value is overlaid with the Price-Quality alignment, customers of all brands feel that the premiums charged do not match the quality of the cover and experience on offer.  In this regard, Discovery has the biggest gap (-6.2) in Perceived Value and Price-Quality alignment, followed by Bonitas (-5.8), Medihelp (-4.9), Momentum (-3.9) and GEMS (-2.3).

Complaints Incidence and Resolution

  • Of the complaint incidence across the industry, customers complained most about fees and charges (22%), claims issues (19%), terms of cover or scheme rules (13%), feedback (9%) and waiting time (7%).  
  • Discovery and Medihelp have the most complaints about fees and charges, both at 28% and above industry average (22%). 
  • Medihelp has the highest incidence of claims-related complaints at 26% and well above industry par of 19%.
  • In terms of complaints incidence and handling the industry average of complaints incidence is 15.9/100 and complaint handling is 48.6/100.  
  • Discovery has the lowest complaint incidence at 13.2/100 and complaint handling of 51/100. 
  • Bonitas’ complaint incidence is at 14.3/100 and complaint handling of 51.5/100. 
  • While Medihelp has a complaint incidence slightly higher than industry par at 15.8/100, its complaint handling score is well above industry par at 55.7.
  • Momentum and GEMS perform below average in the Complaints Incidence and Resolution category.

Customer Loyalty

  • Bonitas has the most loyal customers at 69.4%, above industry par of 64.0%, and has also seen a big improvement of 7.5% in loyalty score compared with 2018 (61.9%).
  • Discovery, Medihelp and Momentum all saw a decline in customer loyalty scores.

Net Promoter Score

  • Net Promoter Score measures the likelihood of a person recommending a brand. 
  • Bonitas has the highest Net Promoter Score (NPS) at 21.6%, which is well above the industry average (9.5%). Bonitas customers are active promoters of the brand to others, with 45% of customers recommending the brand.  Bonitas also has the lowest number of detractors at 24%.   
  • Compared with 2018, Bonitas has seen a radical increase in NPS score when it came in at a low of 2.6%, suggesting that its focus on benefit simplification and customer satisfaction and complaints handling have had a marked impact on how customers perceive the brand, and their willingness to endorse it to others.
  • Discovery follows with an NPS of 14.5% which is on industry par and marginally up on its 2018 score of 12.2%.  41% of Discovery customers actively promote the brand, and 27% are detractors.
  • The balance of scores see a big drop-off on NPS performance well below industry par – Medihelp (10.9%), Momentum (8.4%) and GEMS (-6.7%).
  • GEMS has a high percentage of detractors at 43%, well above its promoters at 36%. 

Treating Customers Fairly (TCF)

  • The degree to which customers feel they are being treated fairly by their medical scheme is highest with Medihelp (78.2) and Bonitas (78.9) – both above the industry score of 76.2.
  • Discovery follows with a score of 77.1 which is in line with the industry.
  • GEMS (73.6) and Momentum (72.9) are lower than the rest of the industry. 
  • The make-up of the overall TCF score looks at seven key aspects including:
    • Fair treatment of customers
    • Products and services that address customer needs
    • Transparent and easy to understand information
    • Advice that is suitable for the customer’s circumstances
    • Products and services deliver as expected
    • It is easy for customers to claim, change provides, complain or consider other providers
    • Customers are treated with respect and there is an open relationship

According to Professor Adré Schreuder, SA-csi Founder and Chairperson, the strongest predictors of satisfaction in the medical schemes sector is the degree to which customers feel that their healthcare cover provides peace of mind and their provider delivers as they were led to believe. 

“It is notable that customers complain most often about the detail and performance of their cover, the related fees and costs, additional out-of-pocket co-payments, and for claims not being covered in particular when it comes to chronic medication.  The reality of the private healthcare system is that it is a minefield for consumers to understand, fraught with industry jargon, complex benefit designs and scheme rules which make direct comparisons onerous, if not impossible at best.  And it is this complexity that leads to customer dissatisfaction as members simply do not fully understand the scope of their cover, and what they are liable for in event of a claim.  Satisfaction levels for medical schemes are substantially lower than those measured in other financial services industries – one of the key reasons is that the overt complexity of benefit designs does not allow for easy cost versus value correlations,” explains Prof. Schreuder.

Annual private healthcare increases have been well above, if not double inflation, for more than two decades now which has steadily eroded the benefits that consumers can afford, with many forking out as much as 20% of their monthly income for medical aid.  In response, consumers have opted to downgrade to more affordable benefit options.

“Medical schemes responded by introducing many more affordable benefit options, but this diversity has in turn created more complexity, making the advice process more challenging and more specifically, benefit designs are open to greater risks of misinterpretation by consumers.  Few consumers accept, without significant counsel and advice, that a downgrade in benefit option equates to a commensurate downgrade in the reality of what you are covered for, especially when it comes to out-of-hospital costs, co-payments and primary healthcare provision. In many instances, knowing what you are not covered for is as important, if not more, than knowing what you are covered for.  It is this education and unrealistic expectations gap that medical schemes need to address if they are to halt the growing discontent and cognitive dissonance that consumers feel towards their medical scheme providers.  While consumers accept that they need and want medical aid cover given the parlous state of public healthcare, it’s still a significant grudge purchase until needed,” says Prof. Schreuder.

“Products need to be easy to understand and should not cause unnecessary effort to deal with. Staff members need to do their part by showing a high level of product understanding and empathy, taking ownership to resolve issues and providing customers with regular, relevant feedback during any process of interaction. It is very important that customers understand exactly what they are covered for during the sales and annual review process as this is where their expectations are born. The best way to achieve this is to drive simplicity in communication, remove jargon and provide sound advice that eliminates the chances of being disappointed at claims stage,” he adds. 

As a strategic tool for gauging the competitiveness of individual firms and predicting future profitability, an organisation’s customer satisfaction performance, as measured by the SA-csi methodology, provides a predictive indication of how well the firm will perform in terms of future revenue and earnings growth.  Supported by both the scientific and practitioner community, the SA-csi is the first independent, comprehensive national customer satisfaction index with international comparability in South Africa and has collected data from more than 400 000 consumers since its inception in 2012. The SA-csi forms part of a global network of research groups, quality associations and universities that have adopted the methodology of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) via its Global CSISM program.

 

c

Subscriber Terms and Conditions

  1. APPLICATION OF TERMS
    • These terms and conditions (“Subscriber Terms”) apply to the subscription by any qualifying member of the South African Underwriting Managers Association NPC (“SAUMA”) to the services and benefits offered by FIA Services (Pty) Ltd (“FIA Services”) under the SAUMA affiliation arrangement (“Subscription”).

  2. NATURE OF SUBSCRIPTION
    • A Subscription under this arrangement:
      • does not constitute membership of FIA NPC;
      • does not confer any voting rights or governance participation in FIA NPC; and
      • is governed solely by the contractual relationship between the Subscriber and FIA Services.

  1. ELIGIBILITY
    • To qualify for the Subscription, the applicant must, at the time of application, be a current paid-up member of SAUMA.
    • FIA Services will verify the applicant’s SAUMA membership status with SAUMA prior to activation, and may re-verify such status periodically.
    • If a Subscriber ceases to be a paid-up member of SAUMA, the Subscription will correspondingly be terminated.
    • Applicants are required to authorise FIA Services to confirm their SAUMA membership status with SAUMA as part of the application process.

  1. SERVICES
    • The Subscription entitles the Subscriber to the following benefits:
      • Complimentary access to the FIA CPD Platform;
      • Complimentary access to the FIA Insight Magazine (digital edition);
      • Advertising opportunities on FIA platforms at a discounted rate of 15% (fifteen percent) off the prevailing published rates; and
      • Invitations to attend FIA Technical Webinars annually.
    • FIA Services reserves the right to update, vary or substitute the Services from time to time, provided that the overall value and nature of the benefits remain materially the same.

  1. FEES AND PAYMENT
    • The monthly subscription fee is R260.00 (two hundred and sixty rand) for up to seven registered individuals (Key Individuals and Representatives), and R36.00 (thirty-six rand) per additional registered individual thereafter, excluding VAT.
    • The Subscriber shall provide FIA Services with the required details of each individual to be registered under the Subscription for the purposes of activation and billing.
    • All fees are exclusive of VAT, which shall be charged at the prevailing statutory rate.
    • Subscription fees are reviewed annually in March and may be adjusted with effect from 1 April.
    • Any changes to the Subscription, including but not limited to the number of Representatives and Key Individuals registered under the Subscription, may only be effected once annually during the annual review period in March of each year, with such changes taking effect from 1 April.
    • Subscription fees shall be billed monthly in arrears, unless the Subscriber elects an annual billing cycle at the time of application.
    • The Subscriber shall ensure that all billing information (including contact details, authorised signatories and bank account details) is kept accurate and up to date.
    • Non-payment of subscription fees may result in suspension of access to the Services until such fees are brought up to date.
    • The Subscriber acknowledges and agrees that all subscription fees payable under these Subscriber Terms may be collected by way of debit order, which shall be processed by the holding company, FIA NPC (The Financial Intermediary Association of South Africa), on behalf of FIA Services. Payment to FIA NPC shall be deemed to constitute valid and sufficient discharge of the Subscriber’s payment obligations to FIA Services under these Subscriber Terms.

  1. ONBOARDING
    • Onboarding will be conducted as a Subscription with FIA Services under the SAUMA affiliation arrangement.
    • Onboarding will not confer FIA NPC membership status or any associated rights.
    • Onboarding is conditional on confirmation of the Subscriber’s current SAUMA membership at the time of application

  1. DATA PROTECTION
    • FIA Services will process all personal information in accordance with the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA) as set out in our POPIA policies.
    • By subscribing, the Subscriber authorises FIA Services to confirm their SAUMA membership status with SAUMA and to process personal information for the purposes of fulfilling the Subscription.

  1. TERMINATION
    • The Subscriber may terminate the Subscription by giving FIA Services one calendar month’s written notice.
    • FIA Services may terminate the Subscription on one calendar month’s written notice, or immediately if the Subscriber breaches these Subscriber Terms and fails to remedy such breach within 14 (fourteen) days of receiving written notice.
    • Termination of the SAUMA–FIA Services affiliation agreement shall not automatically terminate these Subscriber Terms.
    • Termination by the Subscriber shall not relieve the Subscriber of liability for any subscription fees accrued up to the effective date of termination.
    • FIA Services may suspend or terminate the Subscription with immediate effect in the event of non-payment of fees by the Subscriber.

  1. GENERAL
    • These Subscriber Terms are governed by the laws of the Republic of South Africa.
    • Any disputes arising under these Subscriber Terms shall be dealt with in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions contained in the FIA NPC membership terms and conditions, as modified to reflect that the contractual relationship is with FIA Services.
    • Any notices required under these Subscriber Terms may be validly delivered by email to the addresses provided in the Subscriber’s application form, and such notices shall be deemed received on the day of transmission if sent during business hours.
    • The Subscriber may not assign, cede or transfer any of its rights or obligations under these Subscriber Terms without the prior written consent of FIA Services.
    • No variation of these Subscriber Terms shall be of any force or effect unless reduced to writing and signed by both FIA Services and the Subscriber.